Re: The Usual Heinlein Thing

On Mar 10, 11:18 pm, "Mike Schilling" <mscottschill...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
dwight.thi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 10, 9:32 pm, "Mike Schilling" <mscottschill...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
dwight.thi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Iow, as I said, your original nastiness about reading the thread
before jumping wildly to conclusions has absolutely no factual
basis,
none. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Dwight, does it occur to you that you've now driven three or four
people to pointing out how little sense you're making, and not one
to
your defense? Can you draw any conclusions from this?

I could care less about _opinions_, Mike. I care about _facts_.
And
the _fact_ is, for example, several people have been proven wrong
time
and again _by_their_own_posts_. Not an opinion.

Well, it's pretty obvious that your intellect is superior to anyone
else's here, and why you'd want to hang around and talk to a bunch of
dummies like us is beyond me. Why, it would serve us right if you
went away and never shared your astonishing insights with us ever
again.

See, I've never claimed to be particularly smart. But I do have good
bull*** detectors.

And thanks for acknowledging that yes, for you it is a get-even sort
of thing.

Geeze. Ya think?
.