Re: A Modest Proposal for "An Inconvenient Truth"

In article <23qls3ddt44h61e7v24ft0v31pi61o0fpu@xxxxxxx>,
nanook <no_one@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:48:18 -0500, Sea Wasp
<seawaspObvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Wakboth wrote:
On 2 maalis, 11:46, Stewart Robert Hinsley
<{$new...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <332ks3hofsqgj5mjvob04074i3mjmt9...@xxxxxxx>, nanook
<no_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes


WHEREAS: Anthropogenic Global Warming is *established* fact, not open
to discussion or debate

WHEREAS: Mankind does not now, nor for the foreseeable future have the
technology to reverse or even slow the release of CO2 into the
atmosphere.

Your premise here is faulty. Are you really unaware of the opportunities
for energy conservation, energy substitution and carbon sequestration?


That's way it's a modest proposal.

Yes. An ambitious, and much more fun, proposal, would be:


WHEREAS: Anthropogenic Global Warming is *established* fact, not open
to discussion or debate (TO DEBATE IS DEATH!)

WHEREAS: Mankind does not now, nor for the foreseeable future have the
technology to reverse or even slow the release of CO2 into the
atmosphere. (AAAA! THE ATMOSPHERE!)

THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED that mankind as a whole must take the
following steps:

(1) In proportion to their carbon footprint, all nations will devote a
percentage of their GNP to
(A)Construct huge orbiting solar power satellites (equally useful for
power and for warfare against potential alien invading hordes!)
(B)Building immense underground cities
(C)Powering said cities with nuclear reactors
(D)Supplying air conditioners to their entire population until they
can be moved to the underground cities
(E)Building vast arks in space to grow food and preserve species
which will be wiped out in the coming rise of temperature and oceans
(F) Begin the terraforming of Mars and Venus, and preparation for the
inevitable spread of our species throughout the cosmos like an
unstoppable plague


But, my proposal requires no currently nonexistent technology, only
the collective will to carry out policy.

Which is where it all falls apart...
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Modest Proposal for "An Inconvenient Truth"
    ... technology to reverse or even slow the release of CO2 into the ... atmosphere. ... to discussion or debate ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: A Modest Proposal for "An Inconvenient Truth"
    ... for energy conservation, ... Anthropogenic Global Warming is *established* fact, not open to discussion or debate ... nor for the foreseeable future have the technology to reverse or even slow the release of CO2 into the atmosphere. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: A Modest Proposal for "An Inconvenient Truth"
    ... technology to reverse or even slow the release of CO2 into the ... atmosphere. ... to discussion or debate ...    Building immense underground cities ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Bad day in Oklahoma
    ... water is a greater greenhouse gas that CO2 and there is ... | changing the composition of the Earth's atmosphere will ... It isn't even up for debate that the concentration ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Bad day in Oklahoma
    ... it helps retain energy in the Earth's atmosphere (many gases, ... CO2 will increase the amount of energy that is retained by the Earth's ... What is up for debate is whether we should care, ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)