Re: SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- From: "Jon A. Bell" <esedona3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:15:56 -0700
"Sea Wasp" <seawaspObvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47C80FB5.20601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jon A. Bell wrote:
Anyone else feel this way? Is there another SF writer you try to get
into, but his/her writing just bothers you?
Many of the more respected "literary" ones. Moor***, Cherryh, Wolfe.
Umberto Eco has writing that is so beautiful I can't read it... because I
keep stopping to say "oh, that's a nice turn of phrase", which distracts
me from the actual book. I read books for the plot and cool ideas, and the
prose should NOT make me stop and admire it. It's there to convey ideas,
not show off.
I understand what you mean, but I've read a few books where the prose was
beautiful enough to "stop and admire," but then I got pulled immediately
back into the story. Michael Chabon's Kavalier and Clay was probably the
best example of this (to me.)
-- Jon
.
- References:
- SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- From: Jon A. Bell
- Re: SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- From: Sea Wasp
- SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- Prev by Date: Re: My impression of _Paladin of Souls_
- Next by Date: Re: SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- Previous by thread: Re: SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- Next by thread: Re: SF Writers' Work You Find Unreadable
- Index(es):