Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: phoenix@xxxxxxx (Damien Sullivan)
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:29:23 +0000 (UTC)
David T. Bilek <davidbilek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, so the hippopotamus and crayon thing is, indeed, a little bit of
hyperbole. Yeah, _Mote_ is better than, say, Robert Sawyer's Hugo
winner. But that's not a hugely difficult goalpost to make it
through. It doesn't exactly try to push the boundaries of SF in any
way.
Buh? The Aldeson drive? The biology of the Moties? The million-year
history of the Moties, and how that interacted with the physics of the
Aldeson drive, stars, and the force field rules they had? Those don't
push the boundaries in any way?
-xx- Damien X-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: David T . Bilek
- Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- References:
- Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: Howard
- Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: David T . Bilek
- Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- From: David T . Bilek
- Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- Next by Date: Re: Fermi's Paradox and FTL drives
- Previous by thread: Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- Next by thread: Re: Dan Simmons on Larry Niven?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|