Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: wdstarr@xxxxxxxxx (William December Starr)
- Date: 9 Jan 2008 16:05:30 -0500
In article <6f396189-2c7a-45cd-97e8-75b0fc2c7e03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Herr Oberst <nrvlaw@xxxxxxx> said:
You know, I'm not all that religious (even though the current
project has religion at its core), but I keep running into this
"absence of evidence is evidence of absence" proposition.
I certainly agree, that is foolishness.
On its face it simply goes past logic. That's half the problem.
The other half is that there is no absence of "evidence;" there's
lots of evidence.
Of, e.g., the existence of a supernatural entity that more or less
matches the specs presented in the Old and New Testaments?
--
William December Starr <wdstarr@xxxxxxxxx>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: Herr Oberst
- Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- References:
- Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: William December Starr
- Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: David V. Loewe, Jr
- Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- From: Herr Oberst
- Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- Prev by Date: Re: Terrifying future phrases
- Next by Date: Re: Fermi Solutions Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- Next by thread: Re: Tom Kratman at Baen -- cringeworthy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading