Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Sea Wasp <seawaspObvious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:49:43 -0400
Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <4702D5F5.4090800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sea Wasp writes:
Michael Stemper wrote:
In article <47019087.9070600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sea Wasp writes:
Wayne Throop wrote:
: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
: No, since they travelled approximately 237 light-years. [..in 48 hours..]
Let's see now... newtonian rules that'd be 15 million g.
And ending up moving at about 86 thousand times lightspeed.
Assuming I got my arithmetic right... always a chancy thing with me.
If you (or Smith) dropped a factor of two in there, it comes out to an acceleration of ~180,000 miles per second
Sorry, but that's not an acceleration, it's a speed.
It's an acceleration as I was describing it.
No, "acceleration of ~180,000 miles per second" is meaningless.
-- i.e., one lightspeed per second of acceleration.
That would be ~180,000 miles per second per second
As I said.
No, you didn't. You said "~180,000 miles per second", which is not
the same as "~180,000 miles per second per second". The first is a
speed, the second is (the magnitude of) an acceleration.
*Shrug* I made clear exactly what I meant. And you understood it. And I enlarged upon it -- accurately -- and you, above, show that you understood it, in fact. At worst, I did not explicitly write in the "per second" in the first stage, specifically because I was drawing the parallel conclusion of what Doc was saying about "Accleration of one light".
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Live Journal: http://seawasp.livejournal.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- References:
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Jim Lovejoy
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Sea Wasp
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- Prev by Date: Re: Pseudo-YASID: Happily married, no kids
- Next by Date: Re: Another example of Schuh as moron (was Another Synthol moron)
- Previous by thread: Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: Heinlein/Clarke Recommendations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|