Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- From: djheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx (Dorothy J Heydt)
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:59:17 GMT
In article <5lqa92F9gjvaU3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sean O'Hara <seanohara@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the Year of the Golden Pig, the Great and Powerful Richard R.
Hershberger declared:
This nicely illustrates the pattern. I have seen a few die hards
complain about "contact" as a verb to this day, but even among self-
described purists this is something of a curiosity. The "not in this
house" stance is a sure sign of a lost battle.
Well, but consider, Webster's Third came out in 1961, and Wolfe
burned his copy when the uproar was still new. That's been a
while.
ObSF: Lovecraft considered "scientist" a vile neologism.
An even longer while.
Dorothy J. Heydt
Albany, California
djheydt@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- From: Sean O'Hara
- Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- Prev by Date: Re: Grammar question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- Next by Date: Re: Grammar question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- Previous by thread: Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- Next by thread: Re: Grammer question - is "hir" grammatically correct?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|