Re: The Human Homeworld
- From: DJensen <i_m0nk@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:47:17 -0700
On Jul 6, 9:58 pm, b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael McKenny) wrote:
Hi.
One of the phrases science-fiction has provided, as far as I can tell, is
homeworld. I find it fascinating that notwithstanding such a generations
old idea of the human species existing as one polity on its own planet and
even having Terran colonists offworld, reality has been rather sluggish to
match the vision of SF writers on this point.
My two favourite takes on the idea have to be Asimov's (despite
everything else), and in the War Hammer 40,000 games.
In the Robot's series Earth is an arcology world, most of the surface
left to its own devices or used in automated farming, with man living
in eponymous caves of steel. In Foundation it's a legend, an obscure
legend. The idea of a species so widespread in the galaxy originating
on a single planet isn't even something most people would consider
possible. Almost all records of it are lost, and it's only
rediscovered by connecting some really faded dots.
In War Hammer (disclaimer: I've never read or played any permutation
of it, so put some salt on a spoon and get ready), Earth is known as
Holy Terra. Terra is a Hive World of trillions of people at the heart
of the Imperium. The Imperial Palace occupies all of Asia, and the
planet's dayside glows as seen from space. People make pilgrimages to
Earth (it's the final resting place of the God-Emperor of Man), which
is an idea I'm "inspired" (stealing) to use in my own work in
progress. The Imperium is a brutal and terrible place, but I like the
idea of Earth itself as a religious site.
I notice Boutros Boutros-Ghali is supporting a 2007 UN Parliamentary
Assembly campaign:
http://www.unpacampaign.org
I can see how this concept begins to address criticism by some against the
low level of democracy in the current UN structure.
There's a rather low level of democracy in a considerable number of UN
members, including those given the cushiest seats at the top of the
heap. And looking at how Big Business has tried (and succeeded in)
interfering with the European Parliament, I have little hope that a
world parliament would fare any better in putting people ahead of
money.
If anyone else here has any thoughts on this issue, it would be
interesting to read them.
It's interesting that the site doesn't provide an Arabic, Hindi or
Chinese translation, excluding over a third of the Homeworld's
population from being informed in their native (or regionally-
dominate) language.
--
DJensen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Human Homeworld
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: The Human Homeworld
- From: Jasper Janssen
- Re: The Human Homeworld
- From: tkmailers
- Re: The Human Homeworld
- References:
- The Human Homeworld
- From: Michael McKenny
- The Human Homeworld
- Prev by Date: Re: Erikson's Malazan Series -- Does it Get Better? [Some Spoilers]
- Next by Date: Re: Erikson's Malazan Series -- Does it Get Better? [Some Spoilers]
- Previous by thread: Re: The Human Homeworld
- Next by thread: Re: The Human Homeworld
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading