Re: The Wikipedia FAQK



On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:40:46 -0700, veritas <khogantwo@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, David Johnston <d...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:59:51 GMT, Joe Bednorz





<inva...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 19:42:59 +0000, Paul Arthur wrote in
<slrnf7qtu3.7u5.floweryson...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On 2007-06-23, Joe Bednorz <inva...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:56:48 +0000, Paul Arthur wrote in
<slrnf7orug.7u5.floweryson...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Don't you have anything original to say? Endless reposting of other
peoples' insights into Wikipedia are not extremely helpful.

Wikipedia forbids original research. Wikipedia blindly serves up
other people's opinions. I'm doing at least that well.

Anyone willing to doubt Neil Gaiman, Harlan Ellison, Patrick Nielsen
Hayden, and Teresa Nielsen Hayden is not going to care about my opinion.

Have you heard about this wonderful new logical fallacy that was
discovered the other day? It's called the "appeal to authority".

There's nothing fallacious about appealing to authority.

Not quite true. There's nothing fallacious about invoking the word of
an expert in a subject when trying to establish a fact. However there
is something very fallacious about invoking the authority of a famous
name to support a value judgement. What does it matter whether
Ellison or Gaiman dislike Wikipedia? Heck they're both demanding and
disputatious fellas who want everything just so. But they aren't
experts speaking in a field of their expertise about something
factual. - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

David,
You don't know what my field of expertise is, so how would you
know?

Well I know you're stupid enough to think we were talking about you
when you were never mentioned.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Wikipedia FAQK
    ... other people's opinions. ... is something very fallacious about invoking the authority of a famous ... Ellison or Gaiman dislike Wikipedia? ... You don't know what my field of expertise is, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: The Wikipedia FAQK
    ... other people's opinions. ... Ellison or Gaiman dislike Wikipedia? ... You don't know what my field of expertise is, ... answering nitwits. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Invitation to bash me.
    ... Abnormal psychology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... I am stating my personal opinions rather than strongly held beliefs. ... In my opinion I am not suffering from Egocentrism. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: The case for physically separated bike lanes
    ... opinions on a website that must mean you also possess expertise on ... own opinions without misstating those of others. ... You are not free to distort my words and you are not free to pretend ...
    (rec.bicycles.misc)
  • Re: Cook the Kook again discredited
    ... As can people with little or no expertise. ... There are some great articles on Wikipedia. ... Which makes it an unreliable source for serious historians because there is no way of knowing the value or truth of what has been posted. ... Those of us who publishe want a reaction and discussion from our peers. ...
    (soc.history.medieval)

Loading