Re: Space Opry
- From: "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:19:47 -0700
"Richard R. Hershberger" <rrhersh@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180977008.307766.99280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 31, 10:26 pm, wdst...@xxxxxxxxx (William December Starr) wrote:
In article <1180624261.554109.23...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Richard R. Hershberger" <rrhe...@xxxxxxxx> said:
[ re Brust's TO REIGN IN HELL ]
In fairness, he was re-interpreting an existing story, telling it
not as a black-and-white story of good guys and bad guys, but as a
series of mostly well-intentioned beings having a failure to
communicate, leading to whackiness. It's not so much that the
failure to communicate is a cheap devise to move the plot along as
it is the entire point of the re-telling.
Which sort of leads one to ask whether the retelling was needed.
I've been thinking about this the past few days, because I have such a
different reaction. I think I have figured it out. I grew up (and
still am) churched. There is a long tradition of taking various
religious stories and reinterpreting them using contemporary literary
forms. Milton's Paradise Lost is a good example of this. This
tradition continues today, such as The Last Temptation of Christ--
either the book or the movie.
I take To Reign in Hell as fitting right into this tradition. Brust
took the idea of replacing malice with a failure to communicate, and
applied it to the archetypal story of malice. A few centuries ago
this would have been done as an epic poem. It being the 20th century,
Brust did it as a novel.
I can see how if you approach it from the expectations of a modern
novel alone, the reaction would be different. A reliance upon
miscommunication is often the sign of lazy plotting. I don't think it
is the case here, but if one is not interested in the book as a
reinterpretation of an old story, I suppose the miscommunication would
have the same effect as if it were simple sloppiness.
Thank you. I now have something to think about should I reread it.
.
- References:
- Re: Space Opry
- From: William December Starr
- Re: Space Opry
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Space Opry
- Prev by Date: Re: permanent floating Heinlein discussion
- Next by Date: Recently read: Riding the Crocodile, by Greg Egan
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Opry
- Next by thread: Re: Space Opry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|