Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Kurt Busiek <kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:13:35 -0700
On 2007-05-31 11:39:49 -0700, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@xxxxxxx> said:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 08:00:03 -0500, mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael
Stemper) wrote:
In article <1180564634.333508.184190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, T Guy writes:Lawrence Watt-Evans <l...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The stereotype really did have a basis in fact.
Said basis possibly being a Scottish engineer called Watt (as in light
bulbs).
I believe that you mean "Watt (as in steam engines)". James Watt had
nothing to do with light bulbs.
Except for having the unit of power named after him.
All the same, I grew up hearing over and over and over and OVER, "Your
name is Watt? You must be bright!"
A single watt is bright?
kdb
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: T Guy
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Lawrence Watt-Evans
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- References:
- Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Joe Bednorz
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Lawrence Watt-Evans
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: T Guy
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Michael Stemper
- Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- From: Lawrence Watt-Evans
- Beam me up, Arthur
- Prev by Date: Re: Arithmetic Enlightenment
- Next by Date: Re: As Others See Us, in this case the DHS
- Previous by thread: Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- Next by thread: Re: Beam me up, Arthur
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|