Re: speed reading

On 7 May 2007 15:29:55 -0700, "dwight.thieme@xxxxxxxxx"
<dwight.thieme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 7, 4:44 pm, "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3 May 2007 17:10:05 -0700, "dwight.thi...@xxxxxxxxx" wrote:

I couldn't have done this better if I had planned it out - that's the
point, you twit.

So much for your "moral superiority."

You've gotta love that the guy disparaging people and calling them
names left and right will end this post by opining that someone else
is "a jerk."

Irony, thy name is Usenet.

_You_ have to _prove_ it to _me_. You're the one
who made the claim. Now, since you've implicitly admitted that making
a bare statement that puports to be a fact does not, really, make it a
fact, what have you got?

_Prove_ to me you retain all this information.

_I_ took a test, which fact _you_ continually dodge.

Feel free to share this information with the rest of us.

Which part of "which fact _you_ continually dodge." has escaped your
notice, Dwight? It's already been posted - more than once.

In fact, you responded to the post where it was originally mentioned.

I don't
generally converse with you because you come across as an ill-tempered
idiot looking for a fight.

Whereas you are simply a bloated ego lashing out at your betters.

You're the guy, for example, who accused
me of trying to jump killfiles even though it was pretty obvious that
I had accidentally posted from my daughter's mothers' account

Wow.

Just wow.

Is that because people routinely post from their "daughter's mother's
account"?

. . .
and the information was right there.

Did you post proof of this or did you just assert it?

instead of admitting that you
were way off base, you went off on a tear about me posting to usenet
from work, and so it was still my fault.

That's just one gaffe of many, and not the most extreme.

This reminds me of my 25th HS reunion. A guy came up to me, who was a
bit bigger than me and asked me if I remembered some stupid thing I
had done to him back in HS. He described it in nigh loving detail. I
didn't remember and told him so. He was very taken aback that
something he'd dwelled on for 25 years didn't mean squat to me. I
apologized and bought him a drink.

You see, Dwight... I don't remember this at all. You're just not very
memorable or important. All I know is that you are a fairly
aggressive and particularly nasty moonbat.

So no, David, I don't 'dodge' any points you might think you're
making. I'm not responding to you because you're a jerk.

Which, even if true, doesn't mean you are not dodging them. It's just
your excuse for dodging.
--
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American
public."
- H. L. Mencken
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Using one design class to manage each use case?
    ... Responding to Ken... ... It seems to me that creating a new controller class for each use case ... Savings Account class (assuming things like persistence and general ... transactions would likely be a use case, but is there a need for more ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Please help - Cant join PC to new domain
    ... Thanks for responding. ... Tried creating the computer account first and then adding it to the ... Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express ... This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >> Your reminder is misplaced. ... First, I was responding ... >> "If the map is authentic, it must be possible to describe ... >> properties into account." ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Factories and lazy objects
    ... Responding to Lahman: ... Dispatcher IS the controller. ... > mainframe be shielded from Account? ... shield the Account from the mainframe". ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
    ... Surely you wouldn't be dodging a question? ... I do have other things to fill my time beyond sitting here responding to ... posts. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)