Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: "Shawn Wilson" <ikonoqlast@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:41:40 -0700
"Daniel Silevitch" <dmsilev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnee9kms.jm8.dmsilev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"A body which is entirely ASCII may also be encoded in Quoted-Printable
to
ensure the integrity of the data should the message pass through a
character-translating, and/or line-wrapping gateway."
Right.
That ensures that the message arrives at the destination (ie your
newsreader) unmunged.
As opposed to a newsreader that intentionally sends garbled messages?
Then, the destination software is supposed to
decode it and treat the decoded result as ASCII.
No, it specifically isn't.
Which, for a
newsreader, includes putting in the proper quoting characters.
Unless it was sent in quoted-printible, which is intended to prevent exactly
that kind of munging.
Or is it your position that proper behavior for a newsreading agent is
to disallow _any_ changes to the Sacred Quoted-Printable Text,
including, one assumes, your own replies?
When dealing with quoted-printible? Yes.
Shorter version: Your newsreader is not a "character-translating and/or
line-wrapping gateway".
Actually it is. You don't imagine Cox is doing my line wrapping, do you?
.
- References:
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: No 33 Secretary
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Richard R. Hershberger
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Justin Alexander
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: No 33 Secretary
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: norrin
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: norrin
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: norrin
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: norrin
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Mike Muth
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Mike Muth
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- From: Daniel Silevitch
- Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- Prev by Date: Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- Next by Date: Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- Previous by thread: Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- Next by thread: Re: Roads must roll was Re: Most Ridiculous SF Predictions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|