Re: Libertarians and Government
- From: mstemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Stemper)
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:22:31 -0600
In article <442c68b7.37971411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Johnston writes:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:14:39 GMT, Joe Ellis <synthfilker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He was taken into custody on nothing more than the administration's say-so.
As you say, the case is unsettled, meaning the rule is still in effect.
Oh, really? So his CONFESSION is meaningless?
He confessed before he was taken into custody? How did that work?
Lookit. If he wasn't guilty, they wouldn't have arrested him.
--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
What's this in my cheek?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Libertarians and Government
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: Libertarians and Government
- Prev by Date: Re: "V" For Vicious Liberal Propaganda
- Next by Date: Re: Libertarians and Government
- Previous by thread: [OT] Former rafsw regular seen in news
- Next by thread: Re: Libertarians and Government
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|