Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Andy Shepard <andy+usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:13:24 -0000
In <1140139925.687248.258780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gene Ward Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You don't object to a physicist using FTL or time travel, but she can't
use psi? Get real.
FTL, at least, is a good deal more plausible than psi. With FTL, you at least
have the excuse that we don't quite know everything about high-energy physics
yet, and maybe one of those things we don't know yet allows for FTL. Psi,
on the other hand, is constrained to involve only physics on energy scales
accessible to human biology. We do pretty much know all of the physics
involved there, and there isn't anything one could plausibly implement psi
out of.
--
Andy Shepard |
andy+usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
http://www.andyshepard.org/ | http://www.livejournal.com/users/vox_soli/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- References:
- The NEW hard science fiction
- From: David . Paterson
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: David . Paterson
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Damien Sullivan
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Peter D. Tillman
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- The NEW hard science fiction
- Prev by Date: Re: the human empire
- Next by Date: Re: New jobs
- Previous by thread: Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- Next by thread: Re: The NEW hard science fiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading