Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- From: nance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Anthony Nance)
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 13:25:17 GMT
In article <87k6chh7mi.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jens Kilian <jjk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Matt Ruff <storytellers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Annoying ad jingles for heroin and crack that you can't get out of
>> your head.
>
>ObSF: _Stand on Zanzibar_
Which I have tried twice to get into, most recently last week,
and stalled around page 20-something both times. The structure
isn't the problem, but the "lingo" is driving me to distraction.
Reading enjoyment is subjective and all, but I'd like to get
a feel from others:
Is it likely to get less distracting if I simply push ahead?
Am I likely to get used to it enough to enjoy the book?
I greatly enjoy Brunner's work in general, if that helps any.
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- From: Paul Harman
- Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- References:
- Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- From: Matt Ruff
- Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- From: Jens Kilian
- Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- Prev by Date: Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- Next by Date: Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- Previous by thread: Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! Re: Cryptonomicon: arguing on the Internet
- Next by thread: Re: Stand on Zanzibar [WAS Re: IRONY EXPLOSION!! which WAS...]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading