Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: David McMillan <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:38:21 -0500
Peter Bruells wrote:
Craig Richardson <crichard-tacoma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Why should it take longer than designing numerals for 10 thru 15 (base
16), which, AFAIK, are defined in every locale.
Last time I looked, those were A,B,C,D,E,F, sometimes written as a,b,c,d,e,f.
I've yet to see dedicated base-16 numerals.
Although if you're working with 7-segment LED displays, it's A, b, C, d, E, F. I've always wondered if it was just fortuitous, or good design, that hexadecimal just manages to fit so well into those displays....
.
- References:
- The secret history of the US space program
- From: David Cowie
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C (was Re: The secret history of the US space program)
- From: T Guy
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C (was Re: The secret history of the US space program)
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: Mark Atwood
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: T Guy
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: Mark Atwood
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: Peter Bruells
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: Craig Richardson
- Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- From: Peter Bruells
- The secret history of the US space program
- Prev by Date: Re: examples of hard SF in the wild
- Next by Date: Re: The secret history of the US space program
- Previous by thread: Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- Next by thread: Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading