Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C

Mark Atwood <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Peter Bruells <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >> Why should it take longer than designing numerals for 10 thru 15 (base
> >> 16), which, AFAIK, are defined in every locale.
> >
> > Last time I looked, those were A,B,C,D,E,F, sometimes written as
> > a,b,c,d,e,f.
> >
> > I've yet to see dedicated base-16 numerals.
>
> Here's one.
>
> It's kind of neat. I sometimes use it when writing binary and hex
> in my own notes at work.
>
> http://www.omniglot.com/writing/12480.htm

Nice, but it would require replacing 1 to 0, too.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
    ... >> 16), which, AFAIK, are defined in every locale. ... I sometimes use it when writing binary and hex ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
    ... > 16), which, AFAIK, are defined in every locale. ... I've yet to see dedicated base-16 numerals. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Plan A, Plan B, Plan C
    ... Peter Bruells wrote: ... 16), which, AFAIK, are defined in every locale. ... I've yet to see dedicated base-16 numerals. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Emacs file coding problem
    ... >afaik gedit's encoding defaults to the system's locale (should be utf8 ... It should default to the user's locale; ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
Loading