Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2005 11:53:21 -0700
Wayne Throop wrote:
> Or, more specifically, I was just talking about confinement; quarks
> cannot exist in isolation. It's not just a good idea, it's The Law.
> So if I use a powerful enough crowbar to pry one loose from my pair,
> and give it to you, I actually am left with (at least) two, because an
> additional quark will be manufactured out of a puff of logic. And I
> give you (at least) two, too.
But such things are a matter of everyday knowledge. If I take a string
with two ends and pull it apart, and hand you half, you don't expect
your half to be a string with one end.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- References:
- The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: Justin Alexander
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: William December Starr
- Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- From: Wayne Throop
- The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- Prev by Date: Re: Schilling/Santayana; WAS: Question re Larry Niven's Belters ("Known space")
- Next by Date: Re: Time Magazine: 100 best novels
- Previous by thread: Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- Next by thread: Re: The moment the willing suspension of disbelief died
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|