Re: Usenet-controversial
- From: wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Garrett Wollman)
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:34:41 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1129347513@xxxxxxxxx>, Wayne Throop <throopw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>: wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Garrett Wollman)
>: Can you, or can you not, conceive of a system of mathematics in which
>: a *different* number pops out in all those same places?
>
>OK. Some progress in the "what does it mean" department.
>We've come a ways from "pi has a different value".
>But not quite there. What does it mean to be "the same place"?
Thank you for making clear that you have no interest in upholding your
side of the conversation. That being the case, I'll stop wasting my
time.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every
wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | generation can invoke its principles in their own
Opinions not those | search for greater freedom.
of MIT or CSAIL. | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Usenet-controversial
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Usenet-controversial
- References:
- Usenet-controversial
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Usenet-controversial
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Usenet-controversial
- From: Garrett Wollman
- Re: Usenet-controversial
- From: Wayne Throop
- Usenet-controversial
- Prev by Date: Re: There are some good things about a reading speed of 2000 WPM
- Next by Date: Re: There are some good things about a reading speed of 2000 WPM
- Previous by thread: Re: Usenet-controversial
- Next by thread: Re: Usenet-controversial
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|