Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF

Tina_Hall@xxxxxxxxxxx (Tina Hall) wrote:
>David Bilek <dtbilek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Tina_Hall@xxxxxxxxxxx (Tina Hall) wrote:
>>> Andrew Wheeler <acwheele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Tina Hall wrote:
>
>>>> <snippity snip>
>>>
>>>>> I'd just like to point out that the options once again never
>>>>> touch "If you consider 'prose' to be a swearword, and want
>>>>> characters, not hampered by plot or held up by unnecessary
>>>>> descriptions..."
>>>
>>>> If you don't like prose, read poetry.
>>>
>>> If you don't like prose, read prose^prose. Makes sense. Not.
>
>> Uh, Tina, in English at least poetry is not prose. By
>> definition.
>
>And here we go again, Davy demonstrating his incomprehension.
>

Are you kidding? prose^prose is no more a useful definition of poetry
than prose by itself.

-David
.

Quantcast