Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 17:32:28 -0700
Blake Hyde wrote:
> I don't agree with many of Ringo's opinions he's expressed in other
> threads. I don't like Joyce, but I do like many other Literary Writers.
> I took a degree in literature, after all. However, I think I understand
> what he's trying to say: he doesn't like the pessimistic (I don't think
> nihilistic was the right word to use, because there is very little SF
> that I would consider truly 'nihilistic') branch of speculative fiction.
> Like 1984. Like Brave New World. Like Fahrenheit 451, or Do Androids
> Dream of Electric Sheep?, or any of the dozens of other pessimistic
> "futurist" novels.
The earth invaded by slug-ugly aliens who proceed to eat us is
optimistic?
> The idea of calling something you just don't appreciate "literary
> crapola" is... pretty arrogant, though.
It's not the book, it's the publisher. If Baen publishes it, it's OK.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: pmac360
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: Blake Hyde
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: dwight.thieme@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- References:
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- From: Blake Hyde
- Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- Prev by Date: Re: People like John Ringo??
- Next by Date: Re: what is "metaphor"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- Next by thread: Re: Self-selected literati bull*** SF
- Index(es):