Re: the genome as a software system
- From: "rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx" <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Sep 2005 08:02:35 -0700
Tim McDaniel wrote:
> In article <efydndcpxte584beRVn-gw@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Johan Larson <johan0larson8comcast0net> wrote:
> >
> >"Louann Miller" <louann_m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >news:1125837412.52b7f4d9f0932e8ff2d1ac46090bca07@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 03:23:48 GMT, Carl Dershem <dershem@xxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>>It has some potential, but until they know what the gene segments
> >>>*do*, it's only potential. We may have mapped a gene, but we still
> >>>haven't decoded or labeled the whole thing, so it's just a
> >>>beginning.
> >>
> >> Printing out the source code is a good and necessary first step,
> >> but it turns out that the programming team didn't comment
> >> _anything._
> >
> >Imagine a codebase billions of years old, neveer taken off line,
> >never maintained by professionals, and hacked on by every damn luser
> >who came along and felt like a bit of whopee.
>
> WikiLife.
Well, it's more "What I Am Is". Or is that too Lamarckian?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the genome as a software system
- From: Mike Schilling
- Re: the genome as a software system
- References:
- New Orleans, Niven & Mad Max
- From: low key
- Re: New Orleans, Niven & Mad Max
- From: Carl Dershem
- Re: New Orleans, Niven & Mad Max
- From: Louann Miller
- the genome as a software system
- From: Johan Larson
- Re: the genome as a software system
- From: Tim McDaniel
- New Orleans, Niven & Mad Max
- Prev by Date: Re: Worst SF/F book you've read
- Next by Date: Re: SF Author incomes
- Previous by thread: Re: the genome as a software system
- Next by thread: Re: the genome as a software system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading