Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: throopw@xxxxxxxxx (Wayne Throop)
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:47:00 GMT
:: The important thing here was that *competition for potential mates*
:: may have been exceptionally high, although given how cutthroat it is
:: in the rest of the animal kingdom, I personally doubt that.
: "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
: Why in hell would it be high? Are we to assume females died off
: selectively because of a volcano?
Hm. Isn't the issue that survivability of a population isn't
all that sensitive to the death of males, and so increased deadly
competition between males isn't an overriding problem?
In any event, popping back a level, I doubt that a population pinch would
lead to sexual selection based on reckless, testosterone-toxicity-related
behavior, nor particularly encourage such reckless behavior.
Wayne Throop throopw@xxxxxxxxx http://sheol.org/throopw
.
- References:
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Konrad Gaertner
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Peter Huebner
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: phil hunt
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Dorothy J Heydt
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Nix
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- Prev by Date: Re: Why John Ringo Threatens Science Fiction's Future
- Next by Date: Re: Less than 29 pages of The Axe - Opinion
- Previous by thread: Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- Next by thread: Re: Rules for avoiding crap books
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|