Re: John Norman and other versions of 'Counter-Earth' plot trophe



In message <1122415299.25e54389983bd10f0a0c2d2c86ad686f@teranews>, Louann Miller <louann_m@xxxxxxxxx> writes
Not asking about his knowledge of anatomy or psychology, but the basic
idea of an Earthlike planet on the opposite side of our orbit.

Is there anything in orbital mechanics that would make this
configuration impossible? Alternately, is there anything in orbital
mechanics (similar to the Lagrange points) that would make this
configuration likely, however slight the advantage?

It's unstable. Consider a highly simplified system consisting of one star and two identical planets 180 degrees apart in the same circular orbit.

Acceleration can be divided into radial and tangential components (in the coordinate frame of the center of mass aka the star). As above, the acceleration of the planets is purely radial.

Now let one of the planets be perturbed slightly ahead of its proper position. Now there is a tangential component to the acceleration of the planets. The planet which is slightly ahead is accelerated in the direction of its orbit, thus increasing its orbital velocity and radius. The other planet is accelerated against the direction of its orbit, thus decreasing its orbital velocity and radius. The deviation from the initial situation grows exponentially [1].

If this is possible, what about higher numbers of objects in the same
orbit? Would they have to be evenly spaced?

If not evenly spaced (assuming equal masses) the situation isn't stable even in the absence of perturbations, because the tangential accelerations don't balance.

Would we, in fact, not be able to see a counter-earth? Yes, I know, elliptical orbit but I have the impression the ellipse is not that far off a circle.

Should my vague memory of the phrase "Kemplerer Rosette" from
"Ringworld" be helping me out here?


[1] Treat this usage as metaphorical. I don't know whether the actual growth is exponential, polynomial or something else, tho' I suspect exponential.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
.




Relevant Pages

  • Re: Observing & Predicting Planetary Orbits (Easy Step-By-Step Instructions)
    ... the naked-eye visible planets in sidereal ... that ancients didn't have other means to see the stars. ... Mercury whose orbit you can see is eccentric. ... I think this is what makes modern astronomers angry at ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Orbital computations with continuous acceleration
    ... Assume a spaceship capable of continuous acceleration ... Assume it is going to be launched from orbit from solar ... : Title: Optimal Continuous-Thrust Orbit Transfers. ... Gravitational effects of the planets or Sun are not considered even ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: planet help
    ... >>> orbit. ... > that if the twin planets are really really close the ... > apart a satellite that is held together only by its self-gravity. ... Phobos and Deimos are small satellites of Mars. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: Hey Mr. Hyde!
    ... Some other things to note about Pluto: ... It's moon, Charon, doesn't exactly orbit Pluto so much as BOTH ... Very near the Sun (in the vicinity of the ... inner 4 planets, for instance) it would likely be difficult for a ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: 10th Solar System Planet Found Larger than Pluto
    ... I would agree with you there for the *outer* planets of each star! ... "home" star or its orbit will be unstable. ... Alpha Centauri itself. ...
    (sci.astro.seti)