Re: Whatever happened to SFC's name change?

In article <LAhsl.1746$%u5.1661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anim8rFSK wrote:
In article <_u%rl.1589$%u5.552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anim8rFSK wrote:
In article <6ERrl.1427$gm6.972@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Raymond Speer wrote:
Milligan names some of the present generation of Sci-Fi Channel "movies
of the week." Stuff like ANACONDA 1, 2, & 3, BAAL THE STORM GOD,
BONESNATCHER, and the various DRAGON whatevers.

I percieve from the titles alone that there has been an escalation of
quality on Sci-Fi Channel movies, which used to be on the level of SOME
*** FEATURING WINGS HAUSER, ADRIAN PAUL IN CHEAP CRAP, & BRUCE
CAMPBELL EMBARESSES HIMSELF, PART XVIII.

Is it now possible to have a full meal on a lazy day, and not be
provoked into vomiting by watching a TV movie intended for the SF
Channel? Are the movies so improved that you can watch two in a row
without barfing?

Dude, if you actually ever barfed from the SciFi channel, you are
too wimpy to watch it!

You gotsta be TOUGH about putting up wiht lameness and lack of quality
to watch the SF channel on Saturday movie day!
We're putting in a new DVR and/or eSATA. Means I'm gonna lost that
scifi marathon I recorded, unwatched, either way. :(

Awww.

Don't worry, they'll be on again.

Do you get Chiller? They seem to have bought all the really bad Sci
Fi channel movies.

Yeah, Chiller's up in some obscure hidden channel range I never stop at,
up around 200. I've yet to watch anything on it though; seems to be
mostly slasher flicks.

And we get FEAR on On Demand, but it's pretty uninteresting.


You are so demanding.

All they had when I went looking was some endless series of 5 minute
mini movies or something.

--
Bad Reboot's 'Crap Trek' 2009: "No Shat, No Show"
Rated "least anticipated film of 2009" by ETOnline
.

Loading