Re: I am amazed

In article <fbtfoq02uge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ravenlynne
<ravenlynne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:
In article <fbsjpl030c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ravenlynne
<ravenlynne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:
In article <fbs2vi1cr3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ravenlynne
<ravenlynne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Doctor Monkey wrote:
Did I hurt your widdle feewings?

Wasn't that the purpose of your post, you impotent little troll?
Not at all, you dried up old harpy. The point was, that there are an
amazing amount of "SciFi Fans" that seem to be anomalous to what SciFi
is all about: stretching the imagination.

And, FWIW, a person whos feelings are easily hurt, probably should give
second thoughts to hanging out in newsgroups.
There comes a time in every MATURE person's life where they come to
understand that just because one has the ABILITY to be an ***,
doesn't mean that they have to be so.

You are here on usenet, and you TRULY believe that? Further you contend
that I am an ***, using all the words and actions of same? Fighting
fire with fire? Sort of invalidates your point, doesn't it?

Not really. I'm just pointing out your mistake.

What mistake? Opinions are mistakes? Honesty in opinions are mistakes?
Rudeness is a mistake? Thinking DIFFERENTLY is a mistake? Are we all
restricted to a certain mindset here in metaphorical 1984?

But then you knew it
and posted your inflammatory little post with that in mind, didn't you?

I suspected that it was rude. So what? It's not exactly a conspiracy. I
said what I thought. I guess that is wrong for the unapproved.

One doesn't go to a Sci-fi board and put down the posters without that
in mind. You were stirring the pot, pure and simple. And in usual
troll-like fashion, when called on it, you strike out.

"Called on it?" Is that what you call an attack? And, surprise, it
wasn't aimed at EVERYBODY. Just some of the easily offended ones, and
the unimaginative ones.


It's a choice like everything.

Duh. Do you believe you are enlightening me?

Yup. You seem ignorant to that fact.

For one to be enlightened, there needs to be something to be
enlightened about. Returning rude with rude is not enlightenment.
Proving my point while unsuccessfully trying to make an opposing point
may be revealing, but it is NOT really enlightening.


You worded your post assholish and were called on it,

"Were CALLED on it?"

In true troll like fashion, you respond by pointing out a grammatical error.

Grammatical error? Not hardly. More like claiming a action that did not
exist. I replied to posts in the same manner of my original post. I was
led to believe that it was common practice to do that.

FWIW, most people make posts here, are looking for
a reply. And a reply to a reply. If I hadn't got a reply, I would have
figured that there were some people that have no opinions AT ALL, or at
the very least, only had opinions that other people thought they should
have.

Rofl...THAT would have been your conclusion?

So what do you think usenet is, a virtual group hug fest? That "laugh"
of yours sounds forced. And hollow.


then have the nerve to act affronted?

Show me where I was affronted, and had nerve? Or are you just putting
words together, trying to deliberately inflame?

Really, you are too much. If you weren't affronted you wouldn't have
responded...you were clearly triggered.

So, NOW, to reply to a post, one has to be "affronted?" You know that
you aren't showing much more that frustrated emotion here, right? You
are certainly not making any kind of point.

"*** you" is certainly
an insult, warranted or not. I answered that remark. Was I supposed to
gasp and run away?

Well, not gasp...if you weren't affronted, you would have ignored it.
<shrugs>

Ignore this: *** You. Forgive me for not being a person that ignores
such language directed my way.


Perhaps you should take your own advice.

Perhaps YOU should.

I'm not the one who posted an inflammatory post and then bitched about
the response I got. When I'm in your situation I'll explore that avenue.

You know, claiming something and insisting that it is true does not
make it so. Communication is all about using words that apply.


I would contest your claim about there being a point in ANY persons
life where they are No Longer assholes. That is a pretty silly point
for anyone to claim, much less a "mature" one. Assholes are assholes
til the day they die. Any claim less is an unverifyable lie.

I'm not saying that it never happens. I'm saying that there is a choice
when it does.

That is right, and I made my choice. I am tired of being nice to people
that say stupid things.

My post was RUDE.

Well at least you admit it. That's the first step to recovery from
troll hood.

I never denied it, troll-slayer.

No names were mentioned, but somehow people
identified with what I said, and I guess, could not take the truth (of
my opinion), and were upset. Rude equates with ***?

Ummm...yes.

Well, then, how YOU doing, ***?

That being the
case, sweetheart, you sound like you have a gaping hole between your
asscheeks.

Because I called you on being an *** I'm an ***? ROFL..that's rich.

More forced fake laughter. posted for effect? When you call me an
*** in a rude way (is there any other way?), then, by your own
definition, you are an ***. Try reading what you've posted.

Now be quiet while the big people talk.

Boy! That is CERTAINLY a "mature" comeback. It's a free forum, sweetie.
You, and everybody else, can tell people to sit down and shut up, but
don't feel "affronted" if they don't blindly obey you. If you don't
like what I say (or THINK I say. Another thing that amazes me are
people that read {or comprehend} one posted word in ten, then try to
answer something that was not even actually communicated) is to NOT
read it. You should have enough maturity to figure out that trick,
right?

Riled, as I said.

Yes, I just HATE it when unimaginative people try to be clever.

again. *** you.
So, let me get this straight. You are entitled to YOUR opinion, to have
and to hold, but MY opinion calls for a "*** You?
That was his opinion. Again, valid.
And MY opinion is...?

No one said your opinion was invalid, unless that is what you "read
into" the "*** you" statement.

You DO understand that communication is not just the actual individual
words lined up on the page, but also how they relate to each other?
This is sometimes difficult for "robots" to understand. I see a lot of
that.

So you can name call, but he can't say "*** you" to your admittedly
"rude" post? Gnarly little hypocrite, aren't you?

Please, PLEASE, point out to me where I EVER insisted that he did not
have the right to say anything he wanted? I'll save you the time. I
don't give a *** what he, you or anybody says. As it goes, I certainly
have a right to remark on such posts. You're sounding a little
hypocritical to me.

That speaks loads about your insecurity.

More rudeness in an attempt to insult my being? I bet you are good at
controling people using such tools. Threaten a man's masculinity. Once
you get him answering like a child, YOU'VE GOT HIM! Right, sweetie?

No...I'd say it to a chick as well. And bringing gender into it and
trying to insult me by calling me "sweetie" brings your issues into it
again. You truly are transparent.

Said the pot to the kettle. "Impotent: unable to engage in sexual
intercourse because of inability to have and maintain an erection."
Gee, it sounds like YOU brought gender into it first, babe. What was
that you said about being hypocritical?


OK, (try to understand this) I never invalidated ANYBODY's opinion. All
anybody has here are OPINIONS. Any one (or more) persons opinions
CANNOT invalidate any other persons opinion, except from peer pressure,
and that is something that a person allows. Just another example of
semi-literate people reading something that isn't there, or making up
definitions for what is said.

You invalidated his opinions by the way you responded to his post.
<shrug> It's really not that hard to see, for those who aren't blind. U

Bull***. You and he are just offended by what you saw in the words,
and that I said that I thought someones opinion was stupid. Sounds to
me, like you are the blind one. Blinded by HOW I said the words, not
WHAT I said.

You're simply reaping what you sowed. Deal.

Am I supposed to be upset? I guess this is more of that "reading more
into something than is what is actually there" that you seem to be so
good at.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.