Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: "kim" <ntscuser@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 03:10:39 +0000 (UTC)
"hennessy" <hennessy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:124s8uueem9ht2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <wTi3g.106$uT2.38@xxxxxxxx>, Hank Arnold <rasilon@xxxxxxx>wrote:
Hang in there... The episodes do get better. Season Two will have a new
Doctor....
Which is a bloody shame IMHO. Not to prejudge the new Doctor, but
Mr. Eccleston has been great in the episodes I've seen so far. At this
point, I'd have to put him in a tie with Peter Davison in 2nd place on my
list of favorite Doctors so far.. (First place goes, of course, to Tom
Baker...)
The relationship with Rose smacks of incestuousness to me
Two-words, "age-ist".
Just because a man is old enought to be a girl's father (or grandfather)
doesn't imply they have any kind of "unnatural" feelings for each other.
Besides which Ecclestone is quite clearly playing the part of a man who is
(to use a quaint old English expression) "as queer as a four-pound note"
which makes any kind of sexual dynamic a physical impossibility.
(kim)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: Rob Perkins
- Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: Alan Dicey
- Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- References:
- Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: Laura Appelbaum
- Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: Hank Arnold
- Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- From: hennessy
- Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- Prev by Date: Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- Next by Date: Re: Volume Six is ready, time to start all over again on CafePress!
- Previous by thread: Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- Next by thread: Re: Doctor Who, Revived, Season Two
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|