Re: how big?
- From: Wesley Struebing <strueb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:08:29 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:06:33 +0000 (UTC), Jeffrey Kaplan
<rastb5m@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>It is alleged that Matt Ion claimed:
>
>> > That's just a kinetic weapon, not a gravity weapon. A gravity weapon
>> > uses the force of gravity itself as the weapon's force, not the
>> > weapon's delivery method.
>>
>> You're saying gravity had no effect on plummeting the rocks into the
>> ground at terminal velocity???
>
>That's like saying the gunpowder in a bullet is the weapon. The
>gunpowder isn't the weapon, the gunpowder is the propellant.
>
>Similarly, the planet's gravity isn't the weapon, the large rock
>dropped from orbit is the weapon. The planet's gravity is merely the
>propellant.
Just a nit. The propellant IS the force; therefore, by the
definition above, which I left intact, the dropping rock (and the mass
drivers...) ARE gravity weapons.
(note, I don't really believe that the dropped rock is a gravity
weapon, but by the definition above, it is...)
--
Wes Struebing
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America,
and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples,
promising liberty and justice for all.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how big?
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: how big?
- From: Matt Ion
- Re: how big?
- References:
- Re: how big?
- From: John W. Kennedy
- Re: how big?
- From: Matthew Vincent
- Re: how big?
- From: Mox Fulder
- Re: how big?
- From: Daniel Forrest
- Re: how big?
- From: Mox Fulder
- Re: how big?
- From: Andrew Swallow
- Re: how big?
- From: Mox Fulder
- Re: how big?
- From: Matt Ion
- Re: how big?
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: how big?
- From: Matt Ion
- Re: how big?
- From: Jeffrey Kaplan
- Re: how big?
- Prev by Date: Re: how big?
- Next by Date: Re: how big?
- Previous by thread: Re: how big?
- Next by thread: Re: how big?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|