Re: Solar Sats For Real?
- From: "Joel Olson" <joel_olson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:52:35 -0500
"nuny@xxxxxxx" <Alien8752@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:a81d2dfc-993a-4815-86b4-cc4bee227e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30198977/
It depends on the performance of startup Solaren. They say they can
loft a working "self-assembling" SPS in four or five heavy-lift
launches (up to 25 tons each) but won't describe their "revolutionary"
technology very closely.
If it works, they say PG&E will be their first, but not only,
customer.
It also possibly explains this:
http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/04/16/16greenwire-chamber-ads-target-energy-permitting-green-tap-10574.html
If Solaren's gig works we won't need much in the way of on-surface
power.
You trust them, don't you?
Mark L. Fergerson
I'll be looking for the environmental impact statement. :-)
In particular, I'd like to see the numbers for power transmitted and
power received. I.e. the transmission efficiency through the atmosphere.
ANY losses become a heat source.
http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/web/paperwork/currently%20organizing/Military%20EW%20%20Handbook%20Excerpt/rf_absor.pdf
.
- References:
- Solar Sats For Real?
- From: nuny@xxxxxxx
- Solar Sats For Real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Planets and Stars - an idea
- Next by Date: Re: Planets and Stars - an idea
- Previous by thread: Re: Solar Sats For Real?
- Next by thread: How many gs can an angel stand?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading