Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Steve Hix <sehix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:15:15 -0700
In article <gdql79$t90$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
af250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Park) wrote:
"Carey Sublette" (careysub@xxxxxxxxx) writes:
Ook! Fluorine is much rarer than oxygen, harder to isolate, and, for us
Either way (using ambient CH4 or carrying it as fuel) you could do a bit
better using fluorine instead of oxygen as the oxidizer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_rocket_propellants
The greater reactivity and energy of fluorine should improve the lean
flammability problem.
carbon-based bipeds, VERY much nastier. I hope we're not that desperate.
How about a fission-core thermal jet using the atmosphere as the working
fluid? Lower gravity/higher atmospheric density works for us there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Crown-Horned Snorkack
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- References:
- Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: Carey Sublette
- Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- From: John Park
- Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- Prev by Date: Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- Next by Date: Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- Previous by thread: Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- Next by thread: Re: Air-fueled aircraft on Titan
- Index(es):