Re: A bit of chemical engineering
- From: Madalch <tressure@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 27, 2:16 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You start out with a blob of gas that's mostly CO2 with a little
nitrogen.
You want to end up with pure nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and excess
oxygen.
What's the simplest way to achieve that?
Well, you want to leave the nitrogen untouched, but convert the carbon
dioxide into carbon monoxide and oxygen.
That's going to be energy-intensive. If you want a science-fictiony
way, postulate a form of photosynthesis. If you want a real way, then
I'd still go with photosynthesis, but burn the produced plant matter
under oxygen-poor conditions to get CO.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A bit of chemical engineering
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: A bit of chemical engineering
- References:
- A bit of chemical engineering
- From: Logan Kearsley
- A bit of chemical engineering
- Prev by Date: A bit of chemical engineering
- Next by Date: Re: A bit of chemical engineering
- Previous by thread: A bit of chemical engineering
- Next by thread: Re: A bit of chemical engineering
- Index(es):