Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Quadibloc <jsavard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 26, 9:32 pm, Erik Max Francis <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IAU definition accomplished nothing,
except strike one of the previous members off the list.
Actually, it did accomplish something else besides that.
It kept Eris off the list.
Which was, of course, the whole point. Pluto was previously believed
to be larger and heavier than it actually was. But it was still
considerably larger and heavier than Ceres. So there was no real
urgency to decide that Pluto was, or was not, a planet as Pluto
shrank, because there was still a clear threshhold at a size smaller
than Pluto that would keep the number of planets limited.
But when the Kuiper Belt Objects started being discovered, and
especially once Eris was discovered and found to be larger than Pluto,
matters came to a head. If a new category of object existed which
would number in the hundreds, whose members would qualify as planets,
this would create a planet "gold rush", as it were, and seriously
compromise the value of the designation of a body as a planet.
Four new planets in the solar system - Ceres, Pallas, Juno, and Vesta
- was one thing. Thousands of new planets is another.
There's a big enough size gap between Mercury and Pluto that excluding
Pluto is not arbitrary, and the existence of Plutinos, showing that
Pluto's orbit is not "clear", for some value of clear that allows
Jupiter (despite its Trojans) to be a planet - and here numerical
things like Soter's Planetary Discriminant *help* give a quantifiable
justification - adds to the ability to... rationalize the decision.
But the main thing is that while it would be pleasing to add new
planets to the Solar System by ones and twos, if they bid fair to be
added by the hundreds, anything that might be so added ought to be
excluded from our definition of a planet.
However much I regret the downgrading of Pluto, after so many years of
being accepted as a planet, on an emotional level, I still understand
why it was felt to be an unavoidable decision after the discovery of
Eris.
John Savard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- References:
- "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Bryan Derksen
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Brett Paul Dunbar
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Brett Paul Dunbar
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Bryan Derksen
- Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- From: Erik Max Francis
- "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- Prev by Date: Re: How to get Post-Scarcity?
- Next by Date: Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- Next by thread: Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|