Re: Missiles in Space Combat?

SolomonW wrote:
In article <262c2103-86ba-48b8-a6c5-e3388e32c5e2
@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, lwcamp@xxxxxxxxx says...
In any event,
no, there isn't a minimum frequency (zero frequency EM "waves" are
common, we call them static electric or magnetic fields). If, as I
suspect, you are talking about a maximum frequency, there is no known
maximum frequency either. It is just that there is no known physical
mechanism to generate photons with such an absurdly high frequency.

Yet for a weapon designers, the shorter the pulse the better. In theory he cannot do better then that.

Only when you're focusing solely on one single measure of "better". When building a weapon system you have to consider many factors, and the mechanisms necessary for cranking the quality of your laser pulse up to such unreasonable levels will come at the expense of other things.

If you were trying to design an ideal bomb to maximize the amount of explosive yield for its mass, as another example, you might say that it should be composed of 50% matter and 50% antimatter. But if the containment systems have to be made so light and fragile as a result that it can only be moved at microgee accelerations, well, perhaps the more _usable_ solution has less antimatter and more robust containment.

Indeed. And we are limited to pulses of several femptoseconds or more
because we use lasers that emit in the near infrared, with a
wavelength of around 1 micron. So long as our best chirped pulse
amplification lasers operate in the near infrared, we will never get
pulses shorter than several femptoseconds.

Advanced society, I expect will do better.

Magic isn't a good basis for an objective comparison.

But it would be so much easier and amazingly more efficient to use a
much longer pulse (say a picosecond or so) that was made up of visible
or near UV photons, so all the energy would be absorbed by the surface
and could be used to blast through the missile's skin to the
vulnerable components underneath.

If possible you will want to by pass the skin and hit a component underneath.

Could be prevented by making the skin out of the same material as the internal components, if nothing else.

Getting a single photon with
megajoules of energy is so far gone beyond anything we can currently
do it is silly to think about it in this context of realistic missile
engagements.

A single I would agree, but a lot is different.

But the big difficulty is not in the number of the photons, it's in getting any photons _at all_ up to that energy level.

Gamma rays of sufficiently high energy have a tendency to spontaneously decay into electron/positron pairs, for example. I imagine this makes them rather hard to work with. I'm not an expert in the field, but I imagine pushing the energy higher just opens up a bigger zoo of fundamental particle/antimatter particles for things to fall apart into.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question about Vacuum Gravity
    ... > energy, expressed as virtual particles, is a non-zero amount, ... The Standard view is that the virtuals are popping ... >> Since photons only interact with charges, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about Vacuum Gravity
    ... then since EVERY FORM of Energy exhibits ... <snip photon spin-conservation> ... >> no means of preventing a horde of other particles from ... > Since photons only interact with charges, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Ken, need help with this
    ... > 2) The First Law of Thermodynamics concerning conservation of energy ... > directly proportional to its mass and momentum, ... Can we then go the final step and conclude that photons are the ... > pass energy on through waves. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
    ... that the exchange of energy between matter and the radiation field is ... electrons on a target and that you observe that an electron is freed ... Because localized least action travel of all elementary EM events is ... "Travels as discrete quanta" is typical of "photons as billiard ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ken, need help with this
    ... >> 2) The First Law of Thermodynamics concerning conservation of energy ... You just concluded, by your own analysis, that photons ... but the wad has both momemtum and mass equivalence. ... >> pass energy on through waves. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)