Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James Nicoll)
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:01:51 +0000 (UTC)
The assumption is not only that there is no stealth in
space but that the people involved aren't even trying to be stealthy,
knowing as they do that it is a waste of time.
Assume a civilization over at Alpha Centauri. Recent
simulation make it seem possible that one or more of the stars
could have terrestrial planets in the habitable zones. Assume
that the native of Alpha C have spread out across their system
using rockets much like the UberFusion rockets of old time SF:
One Gee Forever (or until they use up their reaction mass in
accordance with M/m = e^delta vee/5,000 km/s).
Let's say that the largest rockets are about the size
of an oil tanker. A quick back of the envelope calculation
suggests that a 500,000 tonne ship with a mass ratio of 4 and
an acceration of 1 G [1] and an exhaust velocity of 5000 km/s
might have a peak power output of 5^16 Watts (plus whatever
for ineffeciencies).
Could we spot this at 4.3 LY? Would we recognize it
for what it was?
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll (For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-shirt, cup and tote-bag needs)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: sigidunum
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: Tim Little
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: John Schilling
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: sigidunum
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- From: Ben Crowell
- Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- Prev by Date: Re: Another dumb black hole question (charge and acceleration)
- Next by Date: Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- Previous by thread: Another dumb black hole question (charge and acceleration)
- Next by thread: Re: Return to No Stealth in Space
- Index(es):