Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: af250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (John Park)
- Date: 29 Feb 2008 13:17:15 GMT
Tim Little (tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
On 2008-02-29, Larry Caldwell <firstnamelastinitial@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Just curious: how unlikely is it that a moon could be formed--or
If Venus underwent such a massive collision, where is the debris?
Venus should have one or more moons accreted from the debris.
Slowly rotating planets are very unlikely to have moons. If a moon
orbits faster than the planet, then tidal effects act to decelerate
it. If there was a moon or debris ring, it would long ago have been
decelerated and re-impacted.
E.g. Phobos will impact Mars within less than 100 million years,
because it is orbiting faster than Mars rotates.
captured--in a orbit so large that the time scale for deceleration is
comparable to the age of the solar system? (I seem to recall there's at
least one retrograde moon among the outer planets that's not due to fall
any time soon.)
--John Park
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Brian Davis
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- References:
- planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Tux Wonder-Dog
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Zombie Elvis
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Larry Caldwell
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Tim Little
- planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Prev by Date: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Next by Date: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Previous by thread: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Next by thread: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|