Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Larry Caldwell <firstnamelastinitial@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:35:22 -0800
In article <mjscs3d60ttflpjbddms7l1g53bbo0om4n@xxxxxxx>,
DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zombie Elvis) says...
Here's a blog post which points to a New Scientist article on a paper
which postulates that a collision of two proto-planets might be
responsible for the formation of Venus and explains its lack of water
and funky rotation. The article is subscription only, the blog post is
light on details, and the paper itself they are both based upon is
also subscription only but hey, it's a start.
If Venus underwent such a massive collision, where is the debris?
Venus should have one or more moons accreted from the debris.
--
For email, replace firstnamelastinitial
with my first name and last initial.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Tim Little
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Zombie Elvis
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- References:
- planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Tux Wonder-Dog
- Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- From: Zombie Elvis
- planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Prev by Date: Re: Negative Energy
- Next by Date: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Previous by thread: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Next by thread: Re: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|