Re: Slow Stealth

On Feb 26, 2:02 pm, CharlesRCap...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 26, 11:42 am, IsaacKuo <mech...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:55 am, CharlesRCap...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 25, 4:29 pm, IsaacKuo <mech...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:14 pm, CharlesRCap...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

All of these values could be off by huge amounts.

I found that the numbers I was using lead to a perpetual motion
machine. I looked around a bit and adjusted the compression factor to
1.416 and the draw factor to 0.25. This leads to more satisfactory
numbers (i.e. I believe I'm going in the right direction, which is
less efficiency) but they still amount to little more than wild
guesses.
.