Re: Number of low eccentricity distant planets
- From: Gene Hatch <spammenot@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:20:26 GMT
John Park wrote:
Erik Max Francis (max@xxxxxxxxxxx) writes:Makes sense. Thanks for your answers.[...] On the other hand, the selection effect is significant, since our methods of detection so far only allow us to detect large bodies, close in. [...]
A bit overstated: we're *starting* to detect Jupiters (in terms of mass and
orbital radius).
--John Park
.
- References:
- Re: Number of low eccentricity distant planets
- From: John Park
- Re: Number of low eccentricity distant planets
- Prev by Date: Re: Optimal location of world capital
- Next by Date: Re: A partial black hole?
- Previous by thread: Re: Number of low eccentricity distant planets
- Next by thread: planetary and atmospheric rotation - origins, direction, etc
- Index(es):