Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- From: Damien Valentine <valends3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:33:40 -0000
On Sep 27, 4:13 pm, Hardcow...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
But seriously, the idea is to optimize the ecology to maximize human
survivability. I'm sure life *as such* can go through hell or high
water, but it's not much use to us if we can't be here to enjoy it...
Oh, poo. That takes all the fun out of it...
I'm suprised nobody has mentioned a universal One Child Law like they
have in China. As long as the Earth has billions more human beings
than it can support, all the radioactive-waste-belching-nuke-plants
and impossible-city-sized-flying-solar-panels aren't going to do a
lick of good. Forests will still be cleared for farmland. Fisheries
are still going to be depleted. Mines are still going to be stripped.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- From: Matthias Warkus
- Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- From: James Nicoll
- Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- References:
- What would you do to save the environment?
- From: Hardcowded
- Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- From: Matthias Warkus
- Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- From: Hardcowded
- What would you do to save the environment?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bolometric Magnitude of non-Main Sequence Stars
- Next by Date: Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- Previous by thread: Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- Next by thread: Re: What would you do to save the environment?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
