Re: Colonizing a Neutron Star
- From: Erik Max Francis <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 02:11:23 -0700
James A. Donald wrote:
Perhaps they are doing something that requires a great deal of energy,
such as mass producing anti matter, or doing high energy physics with
*really* high energies.
Indeed. If it's really necessary, why not set up an automated facility? You can control it remotely.
It seems unlikely that superconductors could exclude the magnetic
field when it gets really strong, so that probably limits how close
you can get.
For real superconductors, that limit is actually very low. It doesn't take a very strong magnetic field to penetrate a superconductor.
--
Erik Max Francis && max@xxxxxxxxxxx && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
I'm crying everyone's tears
-- Sade
.
- References:
- Colonizing a Neutron Star
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Colonizing a Neutron Star
- From: James A . Donald
- Colonizing a Neutron Star
- Prev by Date: Re: Colonizing a Neutron Star
- Next by Date: Re: Rate of erosion of buildings?
- Previous by thread: Re: Colonizing a Neutron Star
- Next by thread: Re: Colonizing a Neutron Star
- Index(es):