Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: throopw@xxxxxxxxx (Wayne Throop)
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:25:01 GMT
:: "IsaacKuo" <mechdan@xxxxxxxxx>
:: Anyway, I disagree that phaseshift would be in any way analagous to
:: color. Color is something which should be a relatively constant
:: property of an object. A red apple might be lighter or darker
:: depending on the lighting, but it's still red.
But remember, the fact that colors are "objective" is an elaborate
calculation done by the visual system; a calculation that attempts to
take account of the illumination; wildly differing spectra, which would
be taken to be completely different colors if displayed side-by-side, are
taken to be the same color when displayed in an appropriate background.
I see no reason why some property of sound which is not really objective,
and is environment-dependent, could not be processed in much the same way.
On the other hand, I don't see how phase shift would lend itself to such.
So... I tend to agree it's not analogous, but not for that reason.
Wayne Throop throopw@xxxxxxxxx http://sheol.org/throopw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: Eivind Kjorstad
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- References:
- Alternate Visual Systems
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: Jens Egon Nyborg
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: IsaacKuo
- Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Alternate Visual Systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- Next by Date: Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- Next by thread: Re: Alternate Visual Systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading