Re: Tracking
- From: "Logan Kearsley" <chronosurfer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2006 05:33:31 -0700
Erik Max Francis wrote:
Wayne Throop wrote:
Shrug. And if doppler says it'd have imaginary energy when emitted[1],
then it'd have imaginary wavelength. Or vice versa. I don't know why
this should be puzzling. It may be unphysical, but not puzzling.
[1] Yes, I realize that this is cheating a bit, given what doppler
is supposed to be calculating. But only a bit. The cheating is,
however, related to the fact that photons do not have, intrinsically,
wavelength of energy. Those things depend on how fast the object
that absorbs them is moving. Similar for kinetic energy, etc, etc.
Conserved but not invariant, and all that.
signal propogation, so
I don't follow this. The energy of a photon is E = h nu. Wavelength
lambda and frequency nu of a photon are related by lambda nu = c. If
the frequency is supposed to be imaginary, then the energy is also
imaginary, not negative.
I follow the part about using the Doppler shift for light to conclude
that the frequency (or wavelength) would be imaginary (although that's
simply taking an equation outside of the domain where it applies). But
I don't see how that's supposed to relate to a negative energy, because
if that were the case, energy would also be imaginary.
Multiply by the imaginary proper time, and it comes out negative. One
wouldn't actually multiply by the imaginary proper time, because, as
Wayne said, it's already been accounted for. But the suggestion was
made, so I decided to play with it.
-l.
.
- References:
- Tracking
- From: MajorOz
- Re: Tracking
- From: Mark L. Fergerson
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Tracking
- Prev by Date: Re: Tracking
- Previous by thread: Re: Tracking
- Next by thread: Re: Tracking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|