Re: Tracking
- From: inprosys@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Apr 2006 22:08:47 -0700
American wrote:
The doppler shift of a gravitating mass is only in-
dicative of a varying "redshift" or "blueshift". The
speed of light is not an absolute constant, as some
general relativists would like everyone to believe.
There is a theoretical construct which provides for
the "illusion" of an expanding universe.
The "shift" in photonic frequency is a result of the
curvature of the spacetime metric, and not the "tired
light" effect of the photon. The geometry of spacetime
itself is responsible for this effect, therefore in
"homogenous space" the time rate has to be slower:
There is a time dilation occurring w.r.t. the curva-
ture of the spacetime (Minkowski) metric.
Although it takes thousands of years for the shifted
wave to reach our field of vision, the Tachyon field
acts instantaneously throughout the current metric,
completely immersing the earth, causing a drop in
the field absorption of gravitational acceleration.
There have been studies that indicate the earth had
less gravity (25%-30%) during the time of the dino-
saurs based on the saurian anatomy, 100 meter high
plants, and increased volcanic activity.
I do not believe that the problem of moving faster
than speed of light is rationalized away by assum-
ing that it is because of the increase of the dis-
tance to them (as in galactic lensing). It is said
that the Friedmann solution of Einstein's field eq-
uation requires it when the g_ik tensor in this eq-
uation is "supposed to be" symmetric. Yet is it
symmetric only because it is "elegant" (according to
simple Euclidean geometry). Yet the ten-dimensional
Calabi-Yau space isn't as symmetric as one might
imagine - there are all kinds of twists and turns re-
lating to the g_ik tensor! One would have to con-
clude that there must be an expanding spacetime me-
tric that is attributable to redshift!
Agreed. One doesn't require the band-aids of the Hubble
Constant in order to invalidate curved spacetime. -"Doppler"
being a synonym for "redshift".
Each of the Schumann resonances are affected by the
seven parts of gravity in a way that adjusts the
resonant frequencies by an amount that is proportion-
ally scalar to the modified amount of gravitational
acceleration, or g_o. How much the frequency is af-
fected depends upon the change in charging capaci-
tance of the earth w.r.t. the ionosphere. The wave-
length of the Schumann frequencies is based upon
earth 5439.38 Angstrom wavelength. This wavelength
varies slightly according to the earth's bulging at
the equator, as well as its flattening at the poles,
in accordance with the formula for gravitational po-
tential as being equal to m / r, where m=GM, where
G=universal gravitational constant=6.67 x 10-8dyne-
cm2/gm2, and M=mass (in grams), and r = the radius
from the center of the earth to the surface.
Since the Schumann resonance is taken to occur in
the plane of a perfect sphere, and the earth is ap-
proximately an oblate spheroid, the resultant
(slight) expansion of the Schumann resonance wave
at the equator (because of the greater distance from
ground to the ionospheric shell), as well as the
slight phase differential of the wave at the poles
(ionospheric shell is closer to the surface of the
earth), along with the seven parts of gravity, men-
tioned above, provide a complete bandwidth of the
Schumann resonance which affects human physiological
programming.
So it is my contention that the Schumann frequencies
affect human physiology, as well as consciousness, by
virtue of the fact that there are blue/red shifted
photonic states of consciousness that affect the
outcomes of our decisions, as well as having ion-
ospheric consequences! Why wouldn't anyone be aloof
to the fact that every 26,000 years, there is a pole
shift taking place?
.
- References:
- Tracking
- From: MajorOz
- Re: Tracking
- From: Mark L. Fergerson
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: Tracking
- From: American
- Tracking
- Prev by Date: Re: Tracking
- Next by Date: Re: Tracking
- Previous by thread: Re: Tracking
- Next by thread: Re: Tracking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|