Re: Tracking
- From: Erik Max Francis <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:28:24 -0700
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
I keep seeing claims that Alcubierre doesn't violate either of the Relativities (isn't unphysical). That seems to imply that there actually _is_ a preferred frame, where all luxons (including gravitons, the quanta of the GraviProtational field) live.
Why do you think that?
I don't follow. Any form of Cerenkov must travel at c, otherwise we couldn't see it. This means that c is the "default" velocity of luxons, when they aren't traveling in some medium other than the New Improved Aether.
_All_ photons (and luxons) travel at c. That's the cornerstone of special relativity, and special relativity is incorporated into general relativity locally.
For all we know ordinary Cerenkov _does_ travel above c for a while immediately after emission, possibly some sort of "near field" effect? Hence _observable_ Cerenkov is only the "far field" part.
Photons always travel at exactly c (locally). Cherenkov radiation is just photons. If you're seriously suggesting that Cherenkov radiation travels faster than c for a time, then that violates special relativity, and Cherenkov radiation is already perfectly consistent with it.
--
Erik Max Francis && max@xxxxxxxxxxx && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis
Stretch a bow to the very full, / And you will wish you had stopped
in time. -- Laotse, ca. 6th C. BC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tracking
- From: Mark L. Fergerson
- Re: Tracking
- References:
- Tracking
- From: MajorOz
- Re: Tracking
- From: Mark L. Fergerson
- Re: Tracking
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Tracking
- From: Mark L. Fergerson
- Tracking
- Prev by Date: Re: Tracking
- Next by Date: Re: Tracking
- Previous by thread: Re: Tracking
- Next by thread: Re: Tracking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|