Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- From: Ordover@xxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Apr 2006 20:25:27 -0700
Well, real space combat would IMHO be short and sweet. The first
targeting computer to lock onto the other ship would immediately fire a
particle beam weapon capable of destroying the other ship (there are no
such things as "deflector" sheilds, of course), which particle beam
would move at near light-speed, much faster than any relativistic ship
can move (we're talking real physics, right) so the combat is likely to
be over before the humans involved ever know it's begun, since it will
all come down to whose sensors and weapons work at a longer range and
whose computers are faster.
But real space combat is unlikely to ever happen, since in the real
world there's nothing in space worth fighting over. Even orbital
bombardment from a ship in orbit is unlikely since particle beam
weapons would pick off the ships and let's face it, the planet being
attacked would have months if not years to prepare at relativistic
speeds.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- From: Stephen Horgan
- Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- References:
- SF rocket propulsion?
- From: Nyrath
- Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- From: Stephen Horgan
- SF rocket propulsion?
- Prev by Date: Re: True "idiot" or "receipe" books needed (restart civilization, etc)
- Next by Date: Re: Amount of plants needed for breathing in a dome
- Previous by thread: Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- Next by thread: Re: SF rocket propulsion?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|