Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Erik Max Francis <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:16:30 -0700
Tue Sorensen wrote:
Relativity, while a
great theory, is increasingly having problems, and something must be
done to untie its knots, at a level that may be so fundamental that a
number of mathematical conventions and assumptions will have to be
revised.
How so? Why do you think it's a great theory? What do you think is evidence that it needs to be revised? What mathematical conventions need to be changed, given that you don't know mathematics?
--
Erik Max Francis && max@xxxxxxxxxxx && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis
A father is a thousand schoolmasters.
-- Louis Nizer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Tue Sorensen
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- References:
- Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Tue Sorensen
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Erik Max Francis
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Tue Sorensen
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Shawn Wilson
- Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- From: Tue Sorensen
- Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- Next by Date: Re: Dragons, again...
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- Next by thread: Re: Dark matter/energy - is it real?
- Index(es):