Re: Use for hydrogen
- From: jtingle <jtingle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:13:46 -0500
On 2 Jan 2006 09:52:03 -0800, chornedsnorkack@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>As for choice of gas networks...
>
>Some gas distribution networks employ coal decomposition gases, which
>are highly toxic because they include carbon monoxide in appreciable
>quantities.
>
>Others use propane and butane, which are easy to liquefy.
>
>And yet others use methane. Which cannot be liquefied at ambient
>temperature.
>
AFAIK, no current US systems use anything but methane or a mixture of
methane and a small amount of ethane (which occurs naturally). Bottled
gas uses propane. Town gas (water gas, producer gas, etc. AKA H+CO) is
pretty much extinct.
Using hydrogen directly would be both uneconomical and unsafe. Better
to simpy use hydrogen and any convenient carbon source (garbage, ***,
coal, cottonseed hulls, wood shavings, etc.) to produce methane and
keep the existing piping network.
This is one of the fallacies of the hydrogen economy crowd. The
simplest thing to do if you find a way to make a lot of hydrogen
cheaply, is to use it and a recyclable carbon source and make methane,
gasoline, or diesel fuel. The combination has almost no environmental
impact.
Regards,
Jack Tingle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use for hydrogen
- From: Steve Hix
- Re: Use for hydrogen
- References:
- Use for hydrogen
- From: chornedsnorkack
- Use for hydrogen
- Prev by Date: Re: Use for hydrogen
- Next by Date: Re: Use for hydrogen
- Previous by thread: Re: Use for hydrogen
- Next by thread: Re: Use for hydrogen
- Index(es):
Loading