Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- From: throopw@xxxxxxxxx (Wayne Throop)
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:03:39 GMT
:: There was another small group of such cases in (I think, guessing
:: wildly) the late 70s or so, because of several batches of (I think,
:: remembering vaguely) methamphetamines going bad in a particularly
:: nasty way.
: Tux Wonder-Dog <wes.parish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
: Indeed. You wouldn't happen to have any references for that
: (methamphetamines), would you?
Well, it was a Sacks book, so go read them all, and you'll fint it
and have a metric hogshed of fun to boot. Actually... I think it was
either in Awakenings, or in The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat.
I think. I also think it's wh ere Sacks had the interesting bits
in about dopamine doses being untitratable being related to neurofunction
being chaotic, with normal functioning some sort of strange attractor,
blah, blah, blah. Not the usual nonsense-jursic-park form of chaos,
neither, but naict an actual, reasonable (if tenative) analysis.
Hrm, I think I should go find that again...
Wayne Throop throopw@xxxxxxxxx http://sheol.org/throopw
.
- References:
- Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- From: Tux Wonder-Dog
- Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- From: Wayne Throop
- Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- From: Tux Wonder-Dog
- Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- Prev by Date: Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- Next by Date: Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- Previous by thread: Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- Next by thread: Re: If nobody wakes . . .
- Index(es):