Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Erik Max Francis <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:35 -0700
brdavis@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Man, talk about my memory failing... you're absolutely correct. Somehow, in my head, I remembered this as a detail Niven got *correct*, not incorrect (he never mentions the residual spin in the short story. Mea culpa.
Well, having Shaeffer survive the experience at all is a big enough boner. Even Niven subsequently acknowledged this ("Alas and dammit").
-- Erik Max Francis && max@xxxxxxxxxxx && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis Extremes meet. -- John Hall Wheelock .
- References:
- Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Logan Kearsley
- Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Hop David
- Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Robert Grumbine
- Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: brdavis
- Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Robert Grumbine
- Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: LukeCampbell
- Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: Ross Presser
- Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- From: brdavis
- Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with worldbuilding
- Next by Date: Re: 2005 car in 1955
- Previous by thread: Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- Next by thread: Re: Surface tension and Integral trees Re: Habitability of Gliese 876c & d
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|